RE: (ASCEND) 185's and 11's?

To: "Peter Galbavy" <peter@demon.net>
Subject: RE: (ASCEND) 185's and 11's?
From: "Mike Hughes" <mike@dircon.net>
Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 15:09:29 +0000
CC: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-reply-to: <000101bd83d3$24c573a0$b8e0c3c1@peter>
Priority: normal
References: <199805200907.KAA02513@mailhost.dircon.co.uk>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

On 20 May 98 at 10:39, Peter Galbavy wrote:

> > Also, when running 1.160T based codes, many V34 users only get 31200
> > connects, which has also caused some bitching in my usergroups too.
> 
> But what real transfer speed do they get. One of the fixes in the
> later code was to connect at more realistic and less aggresive
> initial speeds.
> 
> What does it matter if you connect at 33600 and then fall back in 10
> seconds to 19200 ?

Well, I couldn't agree more, especially as far as the early K56 
speeds used to be.

We know this... but the user sees 31200 where it used to say 33600, 
so they think "Ah, slow" - but are they really going to notice 2400 
bps when they go "surfing"? :-)

Mike
-- 
Mike Hughes - Network Services         mike@dircon.net
Tel: 0181 297 0300                     http://www.dircon.net/
Fax: 0181 463 9820
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) 185's and 11's?

From: "Mike Hughes" <mike@dircon.net>

RE: (ASCEND) 185's and 11's?

From: "Peter Galbavy" <peter@demon.net>

Prev by Date: No Subject
Next by Date: RE: (ASCEND) 185's and 11's?
Next by thread: (ASCEND) What the big ones do
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread