Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) RE: c=185's [Fwd: Ticket # 200300]
At 05:28 1998/05/20 -0400, Cyril Jaouich wrote:
>are full. Now in some cases, if a user disconnects, the CO doesn't ack the
>disconnect and still believes that the PRIs are full.
> We have been running many packet traces on the d-channel of our
>PRIs. Our telco has informed us that the problem comes from the Max
>waiting too long to ack that the release was completed. We are still
>investigating with them, but has anyone ever seen this problem (ie a
>channel on your max always stays free?)
I've seen this only on oue of our boxes that has
mainly perm/switched outbound dialed links,
two PRI going to a NI-2 Siemens switch.
35 channels are expected to ALWAYS be connected,
and sometimes one particular customer with a 3COM router
(it always starts with them, then gets worse)
will have one channel disconnect, and the link drops on the
customer end, but never clears on our side, the max dials out
again on an available channel. eventually all channels are full
from our point of view, even though there should be ~10 free.
It happens less than once a month, and is usually
solved my disabling and reenabling the trunks.
M4048 6.0.0 ftik.m40
-Jim H
----
Jim Howard Sr Network Engineer Lyceum Internet
jhoward@lyceum.com http://www.lyceum.com/ 404.248.1733
My PGP Public Key: http://www.lyceum.com/~jhoward/pgp-key.txt
Fingerprint: 7E8B E2BA 1314 2535 CB08 CFF9 119B 7CD3 2488 954D
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>