Crossfire Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CF: crossfire code directions.
On Wed, 27 Aug 1997, Jan Echternach wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 1997 at 09:24:24PM -0700, Mark Wedel wrote:
> > inline functions would probably be safer than macros (and should be just as
> > fast). Unfortunately, I don't think they are part of ANSI C, although most
> > every compiler supports them.
> If there is a portable way to utilize inline functions...ok.
We can do it IF we assume C++. Other than that, no. Of course, nobody
cares what OUR sources use, so long as our language allows it -- we don't
need macros if we have inlines. (Of course, I have to mention that I'd
love to have Scheme or ThisForth style macros.)
> Jan
-Billy
[to unsubscribe etc., send mail to crossfire-request@ifi.uio.no]
References: