Re: CF: xpm/xbm usage?

To: crossfire@ifi.uio.no, azzie@tellutec.se
Subject: Re: CF: xpm/xbm usage?
From: Brian Thomas <thomas@xplorer.gsfc.nasa.gov>
Date: Sun, 11 May 1997 07:00:56 -0400
Sender: owner-crossfire@ifi.uio.no



> David writes:
> 
> Since I'm doing work on the archetypes, I was wondering how many are 
> actually using the b&w bitmaps? I'm interested, since it would affect how 
> much work I actually put into them, ranging from the current 'just make 
> sure changes arent obtrusive and the archs will remain functionally 
> similar' through 'actually do conversions to b&w' through 'convert to b&w 
> and manually do dithering' depending on how many use them. 
> 

	I use B&W for debugging code and run pix when I play on
	someone elses server. I vote that the pixmaps at least 
	look similar to the xpm versions (ex. small temple arch).

	I have no problem w/ you not doing anything for b&w. b.t.

[to unsubscribe etc., send mail to crossfire-request@ifi.uio.no]

Prev by Date: Re: World Maps and "meta-truths" (Was: Re: CF: some examples)
Next by Date: Re: CF: xpm/xbm usage?
Prev by thread: Re: CF: xpm/xbm usage?
Next by thread: Re: CF: xpm/xbm usage?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread