Crossfire Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CF: New client/server & command buffering.
I'm sorry, I didn't mean to imply that I was removing key bindings
from the client, or sending real key events to the server. I just didn't
like "start <cmd>" and "stop <cmd>" as a way of saying "Event for activate
of binding X" and "Event for release of binding X".
On Tue, 3 Feb 1998, Mark Wedel wrote:
> On Feb 3, 1:25pm, Kristofer Bosland wrote:
> > Subject: Re: CF: New client/server & command buffering.
> >
> > I vote for key-down and key-up events sent to the server. This
> > seems to preserve the best information.
> >
> >
> > -Kris
> >
>
> We don't send keypress events to the server - that would be pretty pointless.
> Instead, we only send command directives, so to rephrase what you say,
> everything we be 'start command' and 'stop command' type of things.
>
> Note by not sending keypresses, it means the client does local key binding,
> which makes a lot of sense (and also allows keybindings to be used acrossed
> save characters.)
>
-Kris
[to unsubscribe etc., send mail to crossfire-request@ifi.uio.no]
References: