Re: CF: images & caching.

To: Mark Wedel <mark@pyramid.com>
Subject: Re: CF: images & caching.
From: Robert Brockway <robert@zen.humbug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 1998 13:27:25 +1000 (EST)
cc: Scott MacFiggen <smurf@csua.berkeley.edu>, crossfire@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: <9803051744.ZM22298@stealth.eng.pyramid.com>
Sender: owner-crossfire@ifi.uio.no

On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, Mark Wedel wrote:

> means less space used.  Unfortuantely, for black and white support, alternate
> color information is really needed (or do we maybe jsut want to make color a
> requirement?)

This came up on the list a couple of years back.  A number of people (now
including myself) use B&W or greyscale xterms, so I for one would be upset
at the removal of B&W/greyscale support.
Cheers,
	-Robert

--Robert Brockway B.Sc.  Email: robert@zen.humbug.org.au, robert@icc.net.au
				r.brockway@uq.edu.au
                         WWW:   http://www.humbug.org.au/~robert
                         President of HUMBUG (http://www.humbug.org.au)

[to unsubscribe etc., send mail to crossfire-request@ifi.uio.no]

References:

Re: CF: images & caching.

From: "Mark Wedel" <mark@pyramid.com>

Prev by Date: Re: CF: images & caching.
Next by Date: Re: CF: Too harsh poison?
Prev by thread: Re: CF: images & caching.
Next by thread: Re: CF: images & caching.
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread