TCLUG Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [TCLUG:8010] IMAP vs POP3
From what I have seen, it was simple program overflow checking with the UW
imap daemon, not the protocol itself.
Thank You,
Ben Kochie (ben@nerp.net)
*-----------------------* [ - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - ]
| Unix/Linux Consulting | [ Haiku Error Message: ]
| PC/Mac Repair | [ Chaos reigns within. ]
| Networking | [ Reflect, repent, and reboot. ]
| http://nerp.net | [ Order shall return. ]
*-----------------------* [ - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - ]
"Unix is user friendly, Its just picky about its friends."
On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, Bob Tanner wrote:
> IMAP vs POP3
>
> I have read the POP3 vs IMAP at http://www.imap.org/imap.vs.pop.brief.html but
> they do not address security. I have seen lots of stuff on BUGTRAQ on IMAP
> holes, so I am asking the community for feedback on running IMAP.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Bob Tanner <tanner@real-time.com> | Phone : (612)943-8700
> http://www.real-time.com | Fax : (612)943-8500
> Key fingerprint = 6C E9 51 4F D5 3E 4C 66 62 A9 10 E5 35 85 39 D9
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tclug-list-unsubscribe@mn-linux.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tclug-list-help@mn-linux.org
>