Re: [TCLUG:9583] List policy (was flamewar)

To: The LUG <tclug-list@mn-linux.org>
Subject: Re: [TCLUG:9583] List policy (was flamewar)
From: Christopher Reid Palmer <reid@pconline.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 1999 10:45:19 -0600 (EST)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9910310109390.22690-100000@destiny.ringworld.org>

On Sun, 31 Oct 1999, Scott Dier - dieman wrote:

> > USENET.  Let's keep the ratio of useful-info/flame-war-crap high.  I'm
> > not going to name names; you know who you are.
> 
> What is the official list policy on this?  Is this a proposal for a change
> of list policy?  Shall there be some sort of process of changing list
> policy?

Why do we need policy when we have Ockham's Razor? Use procmail and/or the
delete key.


--
  Christopher Reid Palmer : http://www.innerfireworks.com/

References:
- Re: [TCLUG:9583] List policy (was flamewar)
  - From: Scott Dier - dieman <dieman@ringworld.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [TCLUG:9583] flamewar
Next by Date: Re: [TCLUG:9578] Just a few announcements
Prev by thread: Re: [TCLUG:9583] List policy (was flamewar)
Next by thread: Re: [TCLUG:9583] flamewar
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread