TCLUG Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [TCLUG:15481] Faeriedist
Dave Sherohman wrote:
>
> Nate Carlson said:
> > EWWWW! Why not follow the Linux (or is it POSIX?) standard for locations
> > of these type of things? That's one of my number one annoyances: having to
> > search all over for config/log files.... look to Debian for an example of
> > how it SHOULD be done. :)
>
> Standard file locations, eh? Are they using /usr/doc or /usr/share/doc this
> week? (Where can I find a copy of the FHS standard that they (claim to?) be
> using? I want to know what this 'share' *&^! is supposed to mean.)
From what I understand, /usr/share (and /usr/local/share, /opt/share,
etc) is supposed to hold platform-independent data. I think it would be
reasonable for a distribution to decide to put it's documentation in
/usr/share/doc, but it has to be consistent (in that case, it would
make sense to make /usr/doc a symlink to /usr/share/doc)
--
_ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ ___ _ _ __ I know everything about
/ \/ \(_)| ' // ._\ / - \(_)/ ./| ' /(__ everything, except that.
\_||_/|_||_|_\\___/ \_-_/|_|\__\|_|_\ __)
[ Mike Hicks | http://umn.edu/~hick0088/ | mailto:hick0088@umn.edu ]