Re: [TCLUG:16045] up2date GUI only?

To: tclug-list@mn-linux.org
Subject: Re: [TCLUG:16045] up2date GUI only?
From: Ben Lutgens <ben@cssolutionsinc.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 10:00:56 -0500
In-Reply-To: <38F48C0B.7DCF3C3E@talkware.net>; from pwiechman@talkware.net on Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 09:45:31AM -0500
Mail-Followup-To: Ben Lutgens <ben@cssolutionsinc.com>,tclug-list@mn-linux.org
References: <20000412011827.C31064@enchanter.real-time.com> <38F48346.635BAD30@talkware.net> <38F48C0B.7DCF3C3E@talkware.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.9i

On Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 09:45:31AM -0500, Paul Wiechman wrote:
>> > You got to be kidding me. Redhat 6.2's up2date is a GUI only thing? That
>> > sucks, what are we suppose to use for headless servers?

Choosy Admins Choose Debian.

-- 

Ben Lutgens         651-623-6162
Sysadmin / IT Consultant
CS Solutions Inc

References:
- up2date GUI only?
  - From: Bob Tanner <tanner@real-time.com>
- Re: [TCLUG:16045] up2date GUI only?
  - From: Jason Jorgensen <jasonj@talkware.net>

Prev by Date: SPARC fun
Next by Date: Re: [TCLUG:16064] SPARC fun
Prev by thread: Re: [TCLUG:16045] up2date GUI only?
Next by thread: More network baby steps
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread