Re: [TCLUG:16210] SGI Indy Picture

To: Twin Cities Linux User Group <tclug-list@mn-linux.org>
Subject: Re: [TCLUG:16210] SGI Indy Picture
From: Nate Carlson <natecars@real-time.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 12:42:44 -0500 (CDT)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0004141245380.7171-100000@dusk.bitstream.net>

On Fri, 14 Apr 2000, Christopher Reid Palmer wrote:
> What kind of memory requirements are you finding Irix has? Can you post
> any stats?

what kind of stats do you want?  :)   i'm still trying to figure out
irix's equivilent of good 'ol 'free'... oh, and you guys gotta remember,
i'm running irix 6.5.. which is _much_ more intensive than 6.2/5.3 (at
least, so i've heard..)

-- 
Nate Carlson <natecars@real-time.com>   | Phone : (952)943-8700
http://www.real-time.com                | Fax   : (952)943-8500

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [TCLUG:16210] SGI Indy Picture
  - From: Jim Crumley <crumley@belka.space.umn.edu>
- Re: [TCLUG:16210] SGI Indy Picture
  - From: Christopher Reid Palmer <chrisp@dusk.bitstream.net>

References:
- Re: [TCLUG:16210] SGI Indy Picture
  - From: Christopher Reid Palmer <chrisp@dusk.bitstream.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [TCLUG:16210] SGI Indy Picture
Next by Date: Re: [TCLUG:16210] SGI Indy Picture
Prev by thread: Re: [TCLUG:16210] SGI Indy Picture
Next by thread: Re: [TCLUG:16210] SGI Indy Picture
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread