Re: [TCLUG:16456] X on a Remote Server

["Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net>]

I believe it is free for educational use.  They made a big deal about the 2
million U.S. users who qualify.

Tom Veldhouse
veldy@veldy.net

----- Original Message -----
From: Tim Sandquist <tim@damango.net>
To: <tclug-list@mn-linux.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2000 12:45 PM
Subject: Re: [TCLUG:16456] X on a Remote Server


>
> What is wrong with ssh2 licensing?  As I understand it it is free
> to use for non-commercial use.  Most of the users on this list
> would probably not fall under the commercial use.  I'm probably
> missing something.
>
> Tim
>
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Clay Fandre wrote:
>
> > Nick.T.Reinking@supervalu.com wrote:
> > >
> > > No, PuTTY doesn't support ssh2.  Here is what the wishlist
> > > says:
> > >
> > > SSH 2 support. The licencing on SSH2 means that I don't tend
> > > to know people who run SSH2 servers, so it would be difficult
> > > for me to give it proper testing.  Someone else is welcome to
> > > do it for me, though.
> > >
> > > What you really want to do is run an ssh1 server on your
> > > Linux box.  Not ssh2.  After you get sshd (version 1) going,
> > > then it is just a simple login to the machine.
> > >
> > > Nick Reinking
> > >
> >
> > Why are people running ssh2? What are the main advantages over ssh1? I
> > really haven't investigated ssh2 so I pretty much clueless. But I do
> > know what the licensing of ssh2 SUCKS. ssh1 works just fine for me.
> >
> > --
> > Clay Fandre
> > UNIX System Administrator
> > Honeywell, Intl. / CAP
> > cfandre@cfsmo.honeywell.com
> > (763)957-3678
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tclug-list-unsubscribe@mn-linux.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: tclug-list-help@mn-linux.org
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tclug-list-unsubscribe@mn-linux.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tclug-list-help@mn-linux.org
>
>