Re: [TCLUG:16456] X on a Remote Server

[Robert Sinland <rsinland@gvtel.com>]

Clay Fandre wrote:

> Tim Sandquist wrote:
> >
> > What is wrong with ssh2 licensing?  As I understand it it is free
> > to use for non-commercial use.  Most of the users on this list
> > would probably not fall under the commercial use.  I'm probably
> > missing something.
> >
> > Tim
>
> Yea. A lot of us do use it in commercial environments. And even if I
> didn't, why do I have to pay for something that should be installed on
> every system by default? Encrypted connections should be the rule, not
> the exception.
>
> I can't wait until the day that all Linux distos ship with openssh and
> NOT telnet. What is the point of having telnet anyway? Let's all boycott
> the telnet protocol!!!
>
> Hey, a new TCLUG web poll... Go and vote NOW!!! http://www.mn-linux.org
>

   Hey, wouldn't that pretty much kill using MUD's as we know it?
Well, heck, who needs them anyway :)
RS