TCLUG Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [TCLUG:16882] SGI Indy dead-on-arrival protection
I belive it was stated earlier that all DOA's would be replaced.
Thank You,
Ben Kochie (ben@nerp.net)
*-----------------------* [ - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - ]
| Unix/Linux Consulting | [ Haiku Error Message: ]
| PC/Mac Repair | [ Chaos reigns within. ]
| Networking | [ Reflect, repent, and reboot. ]
| http://nerp.net | [ Order shall return. ]
*-----------------------* [ - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - ]
"Unix is user friendly, Its just picky about its friends."
On Fri, 28 Apr 2000, David S. Cargo wrote:
> > From: ^chewie <chewie@wookimus.net>
> > On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 08:34:12AM -0500, David S. Cargo wrote:
> > > Certainly this approach has problems (extra cost, extra shipping,
> > > storage of systems, ownership details), but the issue of how to
> > > handle DOA boxes has not been addressed so far as I know.
> >
> > Not to mention either 1) Appointing a crew to test run each system
> > before distributing them to the masses or 2) Deciding who would store
> > the boxes and for how long before selling them off if the DOA's don't
> > happen...yet keeping them long enough to insure that everyone has at
> > least done more than put the Indy in a corner somewhere without
> > powering it on or testing it.
>
> Well, since these machines seem to be delivered without operating systems
> installed, I don't see a way to test run each system without installing
> Irix (or Linux), which, to me, means an installfest.
>
> Personally, if the seller is guarenteeing that they all work, then self-
> insurance is unnecessary. But I don't know if that's the case.
>
> I would rather spend $185 + 5% and know that I'm going to have a system
> that works than spend $185 and have to worry.
>
> dsc
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tclug-list-unsubscribe@mn-linux.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tclug-list-help@mn-linux.org
>