Re: [VANILLA-LIST:2446] Release?

[Quozl <quozl@us.netrek.org>]

On Fri, Jul 09, 1999 at 10:40:59AM -0700, Carlos Y. Villalpando wrote:
> Why does it have to be?  Go ahead and distribute the RSA binaries, but
> include the non-RSA source tree with instructions obviously placed in
> the ./res-rsa directory on which res-rsa package to get and how to get
> the res-rsa package.

Mainly because the RPM build methodology tends to assume things are in
place ready to be packaged, and it makes both source and binary
packages at the same time.

Yes, I see that the sources won't be required that much.

-- 
James Cameron                                      (quozl@us.netrek.org)

Linux, Firewalls, OpenVMS, Software Engineering, CGI, HTTP, X, C, FORTH,
COBOL, BASIC, DCL, csh, bash, ksh, sh, Electronics, Microcontrollers,
Disability Engineering, Netrek, Bicycles, Pedant, Farming, Home Control,
Remote Area Power, Greek Scholar, Tenor Vocalist, Church Sound, Husband.

"Specialisation is for insects." -- Robert Heinlein.