-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jim Crumley wrote: > On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 10:48:07AM -0500, Florin Iucha wrote: >> Please look back in the archives for the last vote we took. Just have >> a form e-mail with the options, and have everybody interested fill in >> their choice and send it to the list. Then, everybody can count the >> votes with a few greps and sorts. >> >> Sorting through last e-mails on the topic, I found these options: >> >> [ ] No change (Twin Cities Linux User Group) -> TCLUG >> [ ] Twin Cities GNU/Linux User Group -> TCLUG >> [ ] Twin Cities GNU/Linux User Group -> TCGLUG > > If there are going to be more than two choices, then we also need > to decide on a voting system. Do we want straight plurality? Or > some sort of ranked or rated voting system? > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_system > > While plurality is nice and easy, I am not sure that it is the > best choice for a vote like this, there may be people that like one > choice, are OK with a second, and hate the third. > What is going to happen to my vote? I founded and run the Twin Cities BSD User Group, and really don't care what happens to TCLUG, yet here I am on the mailing list. Does that mean I get a voice? I've had the (mis)fortune of meeting RMS already which to me seems to be the only reason you'd change the name of TCLUG. In reality he's juts another zealot, fixed in his belief that the world is black and white and he's right and anyone who disagrees with him is wrong. Given the chance I'd vote for the name change just so some of you get the chance to meet the man you idolize so much. - -- Thanks, Josh Paetzel PGP: 8A48 EF36 5E9F 4EDA 5ABC 11B4 26F9 01F1 27AF AECB -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) iD8DBQFI7RdfJvkB8SevrssRAs9XAJ9g1yihJv9wU0+RISS6gKWGquW9FgCfY6Pi TJuIxaw/prkrb72uVzYFkNQ= =dWwS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----