On Wednesday October 8 2008 15:22:52 Jima wrote: > Mike Miller wrote: > > I have noticed a strong tendency toward inaccuracy, hyperbole, > > boorishness and outright craziness coming from the anti-change > > constituency. What's wrong with you people? Why can't you just wait, > > then vote "no"? Please don't answer -- those were rhetorical questions. > > Honestly (and sorry to answer a rhetorical question), I think the > so-called "anti-change constituency" just wants to get the vote out of > the way, and end this drawn-out discussion. It's getting to be > repetitive, unproductive, and terribly time-consuming to no particular end. > I genuinely don't care what happens at this point; I'm just tired of > hearing it. I know I'm not the only one. > > Jima > That's not true. If only for the sake of learning to do these procedural things that every organization must at one time or another deal with in some form, this is imho a good conversation (the one about how the vote would be conducted, that is). -p. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20081008/7b3aebac/attachment-0001.htm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20081008/7b3aebac/attachment-0001.pgp