> It's as smart as TCLUG gets: there is no organization, it has no officers, > no routines, and no substance except this. It's just a list for sharing > info, and "undefined" as strictly any peer to any peer any time. That description sounds exactly like open source software ;) Jeremy On Wednesday 08 October 2008 3:51:16 pm Chuck Cole wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Isaac Atilano [mailto:aristophrenic at warpmail.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 3:35 PM > > > > On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 15:04:19 -0500, "Chuck Cole" <cncole at earthlink.net> > > > > said: > > > TCLUG has no "decider": nobody has the authority to say when a vote is > > > valid or invalid. You don't. Your claim of a voting window > > > is just more of the cacophony by non-deciders. :-) If we must have > > > such poppycock as arbitrary voting windows, we must assume > > > it's a ploy to stack the vote. > > > > What I'm seeing at this point is mob rule, and I for one don't think > > that a smart way of making decisions. > > It's as smart as TCLUG gets: there is no organization, it has no officers, > no routines, and no substance except this. It's just a list for sharing > info, and "undefined" as strictly any peer to any peer any time. It was > smarter in earlier days. > > > Chuck > > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list