>for over 20 years I know of personally (and more told by >designated historians of the associations) ... >with local membership of about 20,000 > I tried to improve things for 5 years as > VP of an umbrella group So, given that you managed 20,000 members as part of an umbrella meta organization, how would you like to see TCLUG ran? Do you wish us to resemble that structure and scale? On Friday 10 October 2008 3:21:51 pm Chuck Cole wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Elvedin Trnjanin [mailto:trnja001 at umn.edu] > > Sent: Friday, October 10, 2008 2:23 PM > > > > Chuck Cole wrote: > > >> Maybe it will create even more opportunity than we have now. This > > >> group is not very active and it has no leadership. > > > > > > Historically, this group TRULY WANTS NO LEADERSHIP or other activity > > > than the list and occasional impromptu gatherings > > > > for beer or > > > > > chow. > > > > > > Imposing leadership (and/or stronger ties to UMN) is likely to kill > > > more of it... or just kill the off-campus interest. > > > > What is your problem with the U? I can't remember any message of yours > > that doesn't mention 'any association to the U is going to kill off > > interest in TCLUG' or worse. Historically, you're wrong. > > No: that's historical FACT for over 20 years I know of personally (and more > told by designated historians of the associations). The 20 or so > professional associations (technical ones) with local membership of about > 20,000 comprised of those who have graduated already from various > universities CHOOSE NOT TO MEET THERE or be affiliated. Parking is a big > reason, but the U itself has been hostile to properly constituted national > organizations that are not under control of the U, except for student > groups which are under U control. I tried to improve things for 5 years as > VP of an umbrella group for these associations, and had mission, had the > mailing lists, and had alumni help, so my info is quite valid. Connections > and help were of no use. I had a professional research fund-providing > interface also. The U taught me/us that a connection with or to them is > "not productive to pursue" and can be bad sometimes. You may contact the > professional associations yourself (perhaps you qualify for membership in > some or are a member) and ask them why they ceased meeting there long ago. > Once you've contacted five or more associations, you can begin to see this > picture and know what the history really is. > > > Some leadership for this group would be good - at least we would have > > someone actively trying to set up meetings (and look for speakers) or > > installfests instead of what we have now. > > The group has discussed leadership before and chose to avoid any. I > favored and proposed some as a 501c3 non-profit, but not at or by the U. > Maybe now it with present attrition it can become a student group at the U. > > > Do you have 20 years of history in this topic or stories direct from more > than ten associations that have even more history?. > > I prefer not to discuss the negatives, except to show history in > counter-response to your claim. We should be concerned with TCLUG and not > hampered by any special connection to U of MN or other that may or could > limit that. Get clear on what the priority really is. > > > Chuck > > > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list