Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36

To: Michael Medwid <mmedwid@symantec.com>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36
From: Damien Miller <dmiller@prometheus.projectx.com.au>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 1997 16:16:57 +0900 (EST)
cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <88256561.0005EDD0.00@notes.symantec.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

On Mon, 1 Dec 1997, Michael Medwid wrote:

> 
> Having been bitten by being an early adopter of 5.0Ap34 (hey - it was
> there!)..I'm a bit
> reluctant to embrace Ap36.  Anyone have some solid up time with this
> revision?
> I'm especially interested if you're routing IP and IPX.  Thanks.  -Michael

]  > tss r
] ts0 system revision: ebk.m40 5.0Ap36
]  > tss u
] system uptime: up 4 days, 4 hours, 48 minutes, 21 seconds

Prior to 5.0Ap36 we would spontaneously combust^H^H^H^H^H^Hreboot every
2 days or so.

Working fine so far.

Regards,
Damien Miller


++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

(ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36

From: "Michael Medwid"<mmedwid@symantec.com>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap36 release notes
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread