Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap36, is this normal?

To: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap36, is this normal?
From: Joe Shaw <jshaw@insync.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 1997 00:50:03 -0600 (CST)
cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <3.0.1.32.19971204174415.00b0aa20@mktg_srv.ascend.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

OSPF and stacking across chasis.  

Regards, 
Joe Shaw - jshaw@insync.net 
NetAdmin - Insync Internet Services

On Thu, 4 Dec 1997, Kevin Smith wrote:

> >FATAL ERROR:  Index: 29  Load: tbi.m40 Revision: 5.0Ap36
> >        Date: 12/03/1997.       Time: 16:13:54
> >        Location: b017ce2c b017cfd8 b017a374 b0187054 b01905b4 b018ee90

> Let me make a wild guess, that you are running OSPF on this MAX ?
> 
> What other options are you using that may make this MAX different from
> others with/without this problem ??
> 
> Kevin

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap36, is this normal?

From: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>

Prev by Date: (ASCEND) Ascend Lawsuit
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Land Attack on max's
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap36, is this normal?
Next by thread: (ASCEND) pesky OSPF
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread