Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (ASCEND) Land Attack on max's




Hi there!

Sorry.
What is this Land attack all about????


Cheers!

*************************                            
Sajari Bin Sarkan       *   
SingNet Network Support *
*************************

On Thu, 4 Dec 1997, Leon McCalla wrote:

> For win95, if you had winsock 2 and TCP/IP update which was released about a
> month ago, you were not affected by the land attack.
> 
> most if not all of the os's listed have been patched by now. just be
> thankfull that the max wasn't listed.
> 
> Leon McCalla
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> >These are the last reports I have seen on platforms/machines.
> >
> >BSDI 2.1 (vanilla)                      IS  vulnerable
> >BSDI 2.1 (K210-021,K210-022,K210-024)   NOT vulnerable
> >BSDI 3.0                                NOT vulnerable
> >Digital UNIX 4.0                        NOT vulnerable
> >FreeBSD 2.2.2-RELEASE                   IS  vulnerable
> >FreeBSD 2.2.5-RELEASE                   IS  vulnerable
> >FreeBSD 2.2.5-STABLE                    IS  vulnerable
> >FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT                     IS  vulnerable
> >HP-UX 10.20                             IS  vulnerable
> >IRIX 6.2                                NOT vulnerable
> >Linux 2.0.30                            NOT vulnerable
> >Linux 2.0.32                            NOT vulnerable
> >MacOS 8.0                               IS  vulnerable (TCP/IP stack
> crashed)
> >NetBSD 1.2                              IS  vulnerable
> >NeXTSTEP 3.0                            IS  vulnerable
> >NeXTSTEp 3.1                            IS  vulnerable
> >Novell 4.11                             NOT vulnerable
> >OpenBSD 2.1                             IS  vulnerable
> >OpenBSD 2.2 (Oct31)                     NOT vulnerable
> >SCO OpenServer 5.0.4                    NOT vulnerable
> >Solaris 2.5.1                           IS  vulnerable (conflicting
> reports)
> >SunOS 4.1.4                             IS  vulnerable
> >Windows 95 (vanilla)                    IS  vulnerable
> >Windows 95 + Winsock 2 + VIPUPD.EXE     IS  vulnerable
> >
> >Some misc stuff:
> >
> >Ascend Pipeline 50 rev 5.0Ap13          NOT vulnerable
> >NCD X Terminals, NCDWare v3.2.1         IS  vulnerable
> >LaserJet Printer                        NOT vulnerable
> >
> >Scott R. Chrestman
> >System Administrator
> >Netropolis Communications Corp.
> >src@netropolis.net
> >
> >On Fri, 5 Dec 1997, Phillip Grasso wrote:
> >
> >> Land attack?
> >> Are ascend max units affected?
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>     Phillip
> >>
> >>
> >> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> >> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> >> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
> >>
> >
> >++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> >To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> >To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
> 
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
> 

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>


References: