Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap36, is this normal?

To: ascend-users@bungi.com
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap36, is this normal?
From: "Mike Hughes" <mike@dircon.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 1997 11:17:19 +0100
In-reply-to: <199712042225.XAA00993@nexus.flensbone.net>
Organization: Direct Connection
Priority: normal
References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.971204090724.24906G-100000@vellocet.insync.net>
Reply-to: Mike Hughes <mike@dircon.net>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

On  4 Dec 97, Oliver J. Albrecht wrote:

> 5.0Ap36 has been up and running for more than 7 days at our site
> (max 4000 and max 2000), the fatal history logs are still empty.
> We're running IP only with RIP (v1) on the Ethernet side, K56flex
> etc... Nothing special like OSPF or stacking...

I'm running the same type of setup as Oliver on about 30 Maxen, and 
one of them FE2'ed on me this morning, only after 1 Day, 23 hours.

Yet, I have another box which is coming up for 4 days uptime, is more 
heavily loaded, and is still going strong, plus the 20-odd others, on 
uptimes of between 4 and 2 days.

I've got it in with EMEA TAC.

Mike
-- 
Mike Hughes  mike@dircon.net  http://www.mike.dircon.net/
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

(ASCEND) 5.0Ap36, is this normal?

From: Joe Shaw <jshaw@insync.net>

Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap36, is this normal?

From: "Oliver J. Albrecht" <oj@nexus.flensbone.net>

Prev by Date: (ASCEND) New P75:s available in Sweden?
Next by Date: (ASCEND) FS: P75 w/switch
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap36, is this normal?
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap36, is this normal?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread