Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap36, is this normal?

["Oliver J. Albrecht" <oj@nexus.flensbone.net>]

In article <Pine.GSO.3.96.971204090724.24906G-100000@vellocet.insync.net> you wrote:

>Is this normal?

>> fat
[...]

5.0Ap36 has been up and running for more than 7 days at our site (max 4000
and max 2000), the fatal history logs are still empty. We're running IP
only with RIP (v1) on the Ethernet side, K56flex etc... Nothing special
like OSPF or stacking...

-- 
Oliver J. Albrecht <oj@nexus.flensbone.net>
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

Follow-Ups:

• Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap36, is this normal?
• From: Jason Nealis <nealis@babylon.erols.com>
• Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap36, is this normal?
• From: "Mike Hughes" <mike@dircon.net>

References:

• (ASCEND) 5.0Ap36, is this normal?
• From: Joe Shaw <jshaw@insync.net>

---

• Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) New beta software
• Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Cause Code 185 / Weird RADIUS problems
• Prev by thread: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap36, is this normal?
• Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap36, is this normal?
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread