Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36
Sir,
I don't see any evidence of the original user having a complaint. The
mention of 5.0Ap34 doesn't look like a typo... just a release which was
never placed on the ftp server. The original poster was likely not
being
sarcastic... simply thanking Ascend for not placing the release on the
server.
There's plenty of other garbage to complain about :)
Stephen Dolloff wrote:
>
> Garbage like this is really irritating. What we have here is a company
> who is forging ahead in areas of new technology and communications. They
> have consistantly continued to develop and support new and emerging
> features. Not only do you want all of the new features yesterday, but you
> expect it to work perfectly and then on top of that, you have the gall to
> publicly criticize them for a one digit typo in documentation the day that
> it comes out. Can you possibly tell me why this is necessary? Or do you
> really have nothing better to do?
>
> On Thu, 27 Nov 1997, Jaap Akkerhuis wrote:
>
> >
> > The 5.0Ap36 (MAX 400x, 1800, 2000, 200+) has been given to support. This
> > release contains the following corrections:
> >
> > Interesting. The release notes talk about 5.0Ap34. Looks like another
> > fine example of Ascends quality control in action.
> >
> > jaap
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
References: