Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (ASCEND) Centrex Calls with 5.0Ap36 (Private/Public Flags)



>From your description, it sounds like a bug. Please open a ticket with
customer support.


At 01:20 PM 12/17/97 -0800, Earl Wallace wrote:
>We have a Max 2000 connected to an ISDN PRI in a Centrex group on
>the PacBell SNFCCA21DS1 (DMS-100) switch in San Francisco.  Up until
>about a month ago we were just like everyone else: we could dial
>inside the Centrex using 5-digits and call outside the Centrex by
>dialing '9' first.  This worked on every release of Ascend software
>I tried.  The 'test' command also worked for this setup.  Then that
>switch was upgraded and the "bootleg workaround" which made this all
>work was ripped out.  The switch guy at PacBell said that SBC wants
>these switches to run clean with no bootleg workarounds from now on.
>
>After this upgrade, I could call anyone except the 5-digit Centrex
>ISDN BRI's.  Didn't have to dial 9 to get outside the Centrex.  It
>acted just as if I didn't have centrex at all.  So I called PacBell
>and they watched me make a few 5-digit calls to some customers and
>noticed that I wasn't setting the 'Private' bit/flag in the 'Network
>Specific Flag' (this is their term) of the Q.931 packet.  Well, I
>remembered there was a RADIUS attribute that might be worth trying,
>so I played around with that and found that this set the Private flag
>so PacBell was happy and I could call inside the Centrex and outside
>as before:
>
>  Ascend-PRI-Number-Type = Local-Number
>
>This worked great in 4.6Cp22 but not in 5.0Ap36.  I tried all the
>values of Ascend-PRI-Number-Type in RADIUS and even went directly to
>the connection profile and tried all values of 'PRI # Type' and none
>worked.  I flat-out was unable to call 5-digit extensions, so I 
>called PacBell and again they never saw the Private flag being set.
>I backed down to 4.6p22 and all was fine again (as long as I used the
>Local-Number value).
>
>I also noticed that the Terminal Server 'test' command was unable to
>make 5-digit Centrex calls in both 4.6Cp22 and 5.0Ap36.  I guess this
>is because there is no way to tell it the call type?
>
>I assume these RADIUS values are supposed to set some flag in the
>Q.931 packet somewhere, so it would seem that one of these guys
>isn't setting that darn Private flag:
>
>  VALUE   Ascend-PRI-Number-Type          Intl-Number             1
>  VALUE   Ascend-PRI-Number-Type          National-Number         2
>  VALUE   Ascend-PRI-Number-Type          Local-Number            4
>  VALUE   Ascend-PRI-Number-Type          Abbrev-Number 	  5
>
>If PacBell is going to do more ripping out of bootleg workarounds,
>there are going to be a lot of unhappy Ascend customers who are
>running Centrex ISDN shops...
>
>-earlw
>
>>From: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>
>>
>>You're dialing out with the MAX then ?
>>
>>I wonder if they mean that the call-by-call parameter should be set to
>>1...maybe it was in your earlier setup....?
>>
>>At 10:50 PM 12/16/97 -0800, Earl Wallace wrote:
>>>
>>>We were running 4.6Cp22 on our Max 2000 and decided to jump over to
>>>5.0Ap36 but had to go back to 4.6Cp22 after we could not call any of
>>>our Centrex ISDN customers with 5.0Ap36.
>>>
>>>To avoid PacBell per-minute charges, we must dial the Centrex
>>>extensions with 5-digits (it can vary depending on your need).
>>>We had the PacBell Tech Support folks watch us make some Centrex
>>>calls and they did not see us set the 'Private' flag in the call
>>>setup.  This flag has to be set for Centrex calls (if the Private
>>>flag isn't set, it assumes you are making a Public call).  In the
>>>past this has not been a problem before because PacBell hacked around
>>>this 'Private' flag requirement, but they don't do that any more
>>>since SBC has declared the switches will run unhacked code, which
>>>I guess is a GoodThing ;-)  4.6Cp22 set the Private flag, 5.0Ap36
>>>does not.
>>>
>>>Anyone else doing Centrex calls to their customers on a DMS-100 in
>>>PacBell-Land with 5.0Ap36? 
>>>
>>>I have reported the problem to Ascend but haven't heard back from them
>>>on this particular issue...
>>>
>>>P.S. - Other than this Private flag problem, we would very happy with
>>>       5.0Ap36.
>>
>>Kevin
>
>---
>Earl Wallace [earlw@walltech.com]       Wallace Technical Communications
>V: 650-938-1352   F: 650-961-9151       http://www.walltech.com
>
>++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
>To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
>To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
Matt Holdrege		http://www.ascend.com	matt@ascend.com
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>


Follow-Ups: References: