Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (ASCEND) Centrex Calls with 5.0Ap36 (Private/Public Flags)



You mean ticket 168992 (Can't call Centrex extensions with 5.0Ap36)
which was opened Dec 10th?  I had been working with Wei_Li@ascend.com,
but several calls and emails later, no response.  

-earlw

On Wed, 17 Dec 1997, Matt Holdrege wrote:

>Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 22:50:15 -0800
>From: Matt Holdrege <matt@ascend.com>
>To: Earl Wallace <earlw@walltech.com>
>Cc: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>,
>    "Oliver J. Albrecht" <oj@nexus.flensbone.net>, ascend-users@bungi.com
>Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Centrex Calls with 5.0Ap36 (Private/Public Flags)
>
>>From your description, it sounds like a bug. Please open a ticket with
>customer support.
>
>
>At 01:20 PM 12/17/97 -0800, Earl Wallace wrote:
>>We have a Max 2000 connected to an ISDN PRI in a Centrex group on
>>the PacBell SNFCCA21DS1 (DMS-100) switch in San Francisco.  Up until
>>about a month ago we were just like everyone else: we could dial
>>inside the Centrex using 5-digits and call outside the Centrex by
>>dialing '9' first.  This worked on every release of Ascend software
>>I tried.  The 'test' command also worked for this setup.  Then that
>>switch was upgraded and the "bootleg workaround" which made this all
>>work was ripped out.  The switch guy at PacBell said that SBC wants
>>these switches to run clean with no bootleg workarounds from now on.
>>
>>After this upgrade, I could call anyone except the 5-digit Centrex
>>ISDN BRI's.  Didn't have to dial 9 to get outside the Centrex.  It
>>acted just as if I didn't have centrex at all.  So I called PacBell
>>and they watched me make a few 5-digit calls to some customers and
>>noticed that I wasn't setting the 'Private' bit/flag in the 'Network
>>Specific Flag' (this is their term) of the Q.931 packet.  Well, I
>>remembered there was a RADIUS attribute that might be worth trying,
>>so I played around with that and found that this set the Private flag
>>so PacBell was happy and I could call inside the Centrex and outside
>>as before:
>>
>>  Ascend-PRI-Number-Type = Local-Number
>>
>>This worked great in 4.6Cp22 but not in 5.0Ap36.  I tried all the
>>values of Ascend-PRI-Number-Type in RADIUS and even went directly to
>>the connection profile and tried all values of 'PRI # Type' and none
>>worked.  I flat-out was unable to call 5-digit extensions, so I 
>>called PacBell and again they never saw the Private flag being set.
>>I backed down to 4.6p22 and all was fine again (as long as I used the
>>Local-Number value).
>>
>>I also noticed that the Terminal Server 'test' command was unable to
>>make 5-digit Centrex calls in both 4.6Cp22 and 5.0Ap36.  I guess this
>>is because there is no way to tell it the call type?
>>
>>I assume these RADIUS values are supposed to set some flag in the
>>Q.931 packet somewhere, so it would seem that one of these guys
>>isn't setting that darn Private flag:
>>
>>  VALUE   Ascend-PRI-Number-Type          Intl-Number             1
>>  VALUE   Ascend-PRI-Number-Type          National-Number         2
>>  VALUE   Ascend-PRI-Number-Type          Local-Number            4
>>  VALUE   Ascend-PRI-Number-Type          Abbrev-Number 	  5
>>
>>If PacBell is going to do more ripping out of bootleg workarounds,
>>there are going to be a lot of unhappy Ascend customers who are
>>running Centrex ISDN shops...
>>
>>-earlw
>>
>>>From: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>
>>>
>>>You're dialing out with the MAX then ?
>>>
>>>I wonder if they mean that the call-by-call parameter should be set to
>>>1...maybe it was in your earlier setup....?
>>>
>>>At 10:50 PM 12/16/97 -0800, Earl Wallace wrote:
>>>>
>>>>We were running 4.6Cp22 on our Max 2000 and decided to jump over to
>>>>5.0Ap36 but had to go back to 4.6Cp22 after we could not call any of
>>>>our Centrex ISDN customers with 5.0Ap36.
>>>>
>>>>To avoid PacBell per-minute charges, we must dial the Centrex
>>>>extensions with 5-digits (it can vary depending on your need).
>>>>We had the PacBell Tech Support folks watch us make some Centrex
>>>>calls and they did not see us set the 'Private' flag in the call
>>>>setup.  This flag has to be set for Centrex calls (if the Private
>>>>flag isn't set, it assumes you are making a Public call).  In the
>>>>past this has not been a problem before because PacBell hacked around
>>>>this 'Private' flag requirement, but they don't do that any more
>>>>since SBC has declared the switches will run unhacked code, which
>>>>I guess is a GoodThing ;-)  4.6Cp22 set the Private flag, 5.0Ap36
>>>>does not.
>>>>
>>>>Anyone else doing Centrex calls to their customers on a DMS-100 in
>>>>PacBell-Land with 5.0Ap36? 
>>>>
>>>>I have reported the problem to Ascend but haven't heard back from them
>>>>on this particular issue...
>>>>
>>>>P.S. - Other than this Private flag problem, we would very happy with
>>>>       5.0Ap36.
>>>
>>>Kevin
>>
>>---
>>Earl Wallace [earlw@walltech.com]       Wallace Technical Communications
>>V: 650-938-1352   F: 650-961-9151       http://www.walltech.com
>>
>>++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
>>To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
>>To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>>
>Matt Holdrege		http://www.ascend.com	matt@ascend.com
>

Earl Wallace [earlw@walltech.com]       Wallace Technical Communications
V: 650-938-1352   F: 650-961-9151       http://www.walltech.com

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>


References: