Re: (ASCEND) TNT 672 modems, DS3 Channelized

[Stephen Balbach <stephen@clark.net>]

On Thu, 18 Dec 1997, Elvis Presley wrote:
 
> One thing, do you want to lay all your dial in traffic on a DS3?  Suppose
> that DS3 goes down.  Out goes...er...672 dial in lines.  Suppose the TNT
> goes down?  Same thing.

All PRI's are mux'd into a DS3 as soon as they hit the CO.
Your allready using a DS3 now. PRI's are much less reliable, cards fail,
copper fails. DS3's reliability is much higher the DS1's. By going with a
DS3 handoff you elimiate an extra de-mux/mux step and the equipment point
of failures it contains.

As for the MAX TNT - thats what Im hopeing to find out. Is it reliable?

	Stb



++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

Follow-Ups:

• Re: (ASCEND) TNT 672 modems, DS3 Channelized
• From: Jonah Yokubaitis <barron@texas.net>

References:

• Re: (ASCEND) TNT 672 modems, DS3 Channelized
• From: Elvis Presley <elvis@clark.net>

---

• Prev by Date: (ASCEND) Could someone translate this
• Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) TNT 672 modems, DS3 Channelized
• Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) TNT 672 modems, DS3 Channelized
• Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) TNT 672 modems, DS3 Channelized
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread