Re: (ASCEND) 96 Modems in a MAX

To: Lanz@rz.uni-frankfurt.de
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) 96 Modems in a MAX
From: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 1997 11:24:51 -0700
Cc: cb@isdnet.net, ascend-users@bungi.com, Lanz@rz.uni-frankfurt.de
In-Reply-To: <199706041542.IAA18798@drawbridge.ascend.com>
References: <(Your message of Tue, 20 May 97 15:53:11 -0700.) <3.0.1.32.19970520155311.00a6c8f0@mktg_srv.ascend.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

At 05:41 PM 6/4/97 +0200, Lanz@rz.uni-frankfurt.de wrote:
>Kevin,
>
>several times you metioned that there is a restriction due to power con-
>sumption comcerning the ordinary MAX40xx units (Order code MXHP-4E1 f.i.).
>
>But you never talked about the MXHP-4E1-2AC / MXHP-4T1-2AC, the unit with
>redundand power supply. I'm curious.

Actually I talked about the MAX. Not a specific version. Both the "ordinary",
and the redundant power supply versions have a limit of supporting up to 72
modems per chassis. The point of redundancy is that a failure of one supply
should not adversely effect the "system" - which it would if we allowed more
than 72 modems: one supply fails -> second supply cannot handle the load ->
power failure -> no redundancy.

Kevin Smith                              Updated Service and Support
Ascend Communications                    Resources are now at:
                                         http://www.ascend.com/service
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.shore.net/~dreaming/ascend-faq>
or		<ftp://ftp.shore.net/members/dreaming/ascend-faq.txt>

Prev by Date: (ASCEND) Radius compilation error.
Next by Date: (ASCEND) 5.0Ai13
Prev by thread: RE: (ASCEND) 96 Modems in a MAX
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Erols PBX "Policy" Accurate!!!
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread