Re: (ASCEND) 5.0AP8 Weirdness

To: Jason Nealis <nealis@babylon.erols.com>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) 5.0AP8 Weirdness
From: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 11:50:02 -0700
Cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970618205622.16642A-100000@babylon.erols.com>
References: <3.0.1.32.19970618171900.00a702d0@mktg_srv.ascend.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

At 08:57 PM 6/18/97 -0400, Jason Nealis wrote:
>
>
>Well, The modems are affected, Cause if a box reports that lets say
>modem 7:13 is having problems, You can not disable it, Then box 
>will always keep that modem enabled. So does TR#2292 address that
>issue also?

The TR should address 'cleaning up' of the modem numbering in each of the
output reports and SNMP. As a short term solution, have you tried 
to disable 7:11 in the above case, assuming that the numbering is
sequential despite the way it is reported?

Kevin

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.shore.net/~dreaming/ascend-faq>
or		<ftp://ftp.shore.net/members/dreaming/ascend-faq.txt>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) 5.0AP8 Wierdness

From: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>

Re: (ASCEND) 5.0AP8 Wierdness

From: Jason Nealis <nealis@babylon.erols.com>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) 12-card vs 16-card (56K)
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) CONFIGURE UNIT
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) 5.0AP8 Wierdness
Next by thread: (ASCEND) ISDN on a user by user basis
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread