Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) 56k and CT1
Dale Botkin wrote:
>
> On Fri, 23 May 1997, Matt Holdrege wrote:
>
> > At 11:39 AM 5/23/97 -0500, Dale Botkin wrote:
> > >On Thu, 22 May 1997, Matt Holdrege wrote:
> > >
> > >> With channelized T1, you must have the telco provision trunk-side rather
> > >> than line-side to get the higher speeds. It's theoretically possible to get
> > >> 56K on a trunk-side T1, but in practice that may be iffy.
> > >
> > >I'd say more like bloody impossible. A line-side CT1 can't even
> > >manage more than 28.8K.
> >
> > It is impossible to get 56K on line side because of the extra A/D
> > conversion. But with trunk side, it is the same as PRI. Only one A/D
> > conversion.
>
> Well, see, there I go not cleaning my glasses again. You DID say
> "trunk-side" in the original reply, not "line-side". Hand me the lens
> cleaner, please. Agreed, 56K on a line-side would be impossible... I
> just can't wait to see how likely it is to work well with trunk-side T1
> rather than PRI.
>
> Dale
>
Watch this space. We have K56FLEX modems going in on Trunkside
CT1's next week- our K56FLEXen on PRI are already working fine.
Even with the marginal phone lines out here in the boonies.
(40-48K worst case via remote-call-forwarding)
'Shot
Darkshot (Michael B. Garrett)
<http://www.gloryroad.net>
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.shore.net/~dreaming/ascend-faq>
or <ftp://ftp.shore.net/members/dreaming/ascend-faq.txt>
Follow-Ups:
References: