Re: (ASCEND) 56k and CT1

To: "Matthew S. Dwyer" <msd@dreamscape.com>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) 56k and CT1
From: Matt Holdrege <matt@ascend.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 1997 17:58:17 -0700
Cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.95.970522200854.22281A-100000@nova.dreamscape.com>
References: <3.0.1.32.19970522160808.0187cc60@mktg_srv.ascend.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

At 08:15 PM 5/22/97 -0400, Matthew S. Dwyer wrote:
>
>Hello,
>
>We are planning to order a number of Series56 modems for evaluation 
>on our CT1 circuits. Given that we have seen lower performance on CT1
>compared to PRI with 28.8k, what sort of performance should we
>expect with 56k? Can these modems adjust for the bandwidth limitations
>per channel on CT1? (200-3800hz)

With channelized T1, you must have the telco provision trunk-side rather
than line-side to get the higher speeds. It's theoretically possible to get
56K on a trunk-side T1, but in practice that may be iffy.


Matt Holdrege  -  http://www.ascend.com  -  matt@ascend.com
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.shore.net/~dreaming/ascend-faq>
or		<ftp://ftp.shore.net/members/dreaming/ascend-faq.txt>

Follow-Ups:

Re: (ASCEND) 56k and CT1

From: Dale Botkin <dbotkin@probe.net>

Re: (ASCEND) 56k and CT1

From: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) Channelized T1 using MF Signaling

From: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>

(ASCEND) 56k and CT1

From: "Matthew S. Dwyer" <msd@dreamscape.com>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Newbie Radius Question.
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Compression
Prev by thread: (ASCEND) 56k and CT1
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) 56k and CT1
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread