I'm glad it's worked out well for you. Please -- buy our remaining Ascend equipment. Cisco has worked great for us. Read the back-issues of this mailing list if you don't think there's a legitimate complaint here. It's not just one person experiencing problems. In our case, we bought a box specifically designed as a BRI router, with two empty slots, which we never populated. We're only using it as a BRI router. Shouldn't it be able to handle the most rudimentary functions it was designed for without crashing or degrading service frequently? Our P400 was ok. Our Max 1800's have NEVER worked correctly from day one. If Ascend really wanted to stand by their products, they could commit to fixing them by a certain date, or buy them back. Mike Berger Shouting Ground Technologies, Inc. direwolf@shout.net > ------------------------------ > > From: "Troy Settle" <rewt@i-Plus.net> > Date: Wed, 13 May 1998 01:06:58 -0400 > Subject: Re: (ASCEND) v.90 > > I've been in the ISP business for about 18 months now, and since day 1, I've > been using Ascend products. Ascend Max 4004, 1800, 4048, Pipeline 50, > Netwarp PRO, and of course, Radius. > > I don't know how long you've been working with Ascend products, but over the > last 18 months, I've used about every 3rd or 4th code release (from 4.6C to > 6.0.4) for the Max 4k and 1800. Stacking has worked in every version, RIP > has worked in every version. Recently, I turned RIP off, and moved on to > OSPF. Worked like a charm soon as I booted up (kinda sucks to have to > reboot to get OSPF going). > > > I don't know what your beef is, but I've had no serious problems that didn't > end up being directly caused by a mistake I made. I have confidence that > when the v.90 code comes out, it'll be of better quality than k56flex was > when initially released, which wasn't too awful bad anyways (sure it had > problems, but the few flex users we had at the time understood the nature of > the problem). > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: <<A HREF="http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq">http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq</A>> </PRE> <!--X-MsgBody-End--> <!--X-Follow-Ups--> <HR> <STRONG>Follow-Ups</STRONG>: <UL> <LI><STRONG><A HREF="msg17205.html">Re: (ASCEND) Re: ascend-users-digest V96 #1159</A></STRONG></LI> <UL> <LI><EM>From</EM>: Phillip Grasso <phillip@1earth.net></LI> </UL> </UL> <!--X-Follow-Ups-End--> <!--X-References--> <!--X-References-End--> <!--X-BotPNI--> <HR> <UL> <LI>Prev by Date: <STRONG><A HREF="msg04667.html">(ASCEND) callback via D channel</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Next by Date: <STRONG><A HREF="msg04665.html">(ASCEND) 5.0Ai10 breaks route table</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Prev by thread: <STRONG><A HREF="msg04665.html">(ASCEND) 5.0Ai10 breaks route table</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Next by thread: <STRONG><A HREF="msg17205.html">Re: (ASCEND) Re: ascend-users-digest V96 #1159</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Index(es): <UL> <LI><A HREF="mail502.html#16500"><STRONG>Main</STRONG></A></LI> <LI><A HREF="thrd10.html#16500"><STRONG>Thread</STRONG></A></LI> </UL> </LI> </UL> <!--X-BotPNI-End--> <!--X-User-Footer--> <!--X-User-Footer-End--> </BODY> </HTML>