Re: (ASCEND) caller-id on POTS port of new P75

To: kevin@ascend.com (Kevin Smith)
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) caller-id on POTS port of new P75
From: David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 1997 19:45:54 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <3.0.1.32.19971001202228.00f6deb8@mktg_srv.ascend.com> from "Kevin Smith" at Oct 1, 97 08:22:28 pm
Reply-To: David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

Kevin Smith sez:
> >I hope you guys have a alternate source for National feeds.
> 
> Yes, Nortel switches....unless my recollection is 180-degrees off ;(

Err...
Yes, You'll likely get National on those.
But it's Nortel's idea of National......



-- 
A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@nrk.com
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) caller-id on POTS port of new P75

From: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) caller-id on POTS port of new P75
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) OSPF and Area Border Router on Max
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) caller-id on POTS port of new P75
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) caller-id on POTS port of new P75
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread