RE: (ASCEND) NavisAccess: "Uncompiled Trap"

["Rogers, Kirk" <KirkR@trant.sp.trw.com>]

Yep!  So did you get NA to recognize the trap?  If so, did you identify
which mib to use?

Thanks

Kirk


	-----Original Message-----
	From:	James Fischer [SMTP:jfischer@supercollider.com]
	Sent:	Tuesday, October 28, 1997 7:44 AM
	To:	ascend-users@bungi.com
	Subject:	RE: (ASCEND) NavisAccess: "Uncompiled Trap"

	        Kirk Rogers said:

	>Im seeing the same thing here...tried the earlier advice and
still:
	><Trap = 1.3.6.1.4.1.529.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0,6,12,1> <V0=4>
	>I noticed this comes up whenever I telnet into the MAX.

	        If it happens when you telnet in, this could be
	        a "console state change" trap.  Of course, you
	        should ALSO get one when you drop the telnet
	        session if it is that trap.

	  A ship at dock is certainly safer, but that is not what ships
are for.

	james fischer
jfischer@supercollider.com

	++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
	To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to
ascend-users-request@bungi.com
	To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

• Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Vendor assigned address
• Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) K56 boards rev. F
• Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) NavisAccess: "Uncompiled Trap"
• Next by thread: (ASCEND) Mixing NAT and NOT on Pipeline 50
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread