> This is a distinctly poor idea. Integrating "new features" into patch > releases makes them... um, let's see... unstable incremental releases. The > patch releases are already recieving too many new features as it is and > aren't getting more and more stable, as they should be. I say stop adding > stuff to patch releases and let things stabilize again for once! Well, we've not had problems with our Maxen on the patches as far as stability. However, the accounting bugs in the lastest versions were noticed. Again, not a major concern. Stability isn't a problem as we can usually reset the Maxen after the upgrade and it's done and they've not crashed. I guess we're lucky. But, suffice it to say, we do need those features. -- Joseph Hickman Director of Network Operations / System Administration josephh@psn.net ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: <<A HREF="http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq">http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq</A>> </PRE> <!--X-MsgBody-End--> <!--X-Follow-Ups--> <!--X-Follow-Ups-End--> <!--X-References--> <HR> <STRONG>References</STRONG>: <UL> <LI><STRONG><A HREF="msg09863.html">Re: (ASCEND) The MAX TNT</A></STRONG></LI> <UL> <LI><EM>From</EM>: Josh Beck <jbeck@connectnet.com></LI> </UL> </UL> <!--X-References-End--> <!--X-BotPNI--> <HR> <UL> <LI>Prev by Date: <STRONG><A HREF="msg09868.html">Re: (ASCEND) BIG problem</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Next by Date: <STRONG><A HREF="msg09869.html">Re: (ASCEND) Re: sigh (bitching)</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Prev by thread: <STRONG><A HREF="msg09863.html">Re: (ASCEND) The MAX TNT</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Next by thread: <STRONG><A HREF="msg09880.html">Re: (ASCEND) The MAX TNT</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Index(es): <UL> <LI><A HREF="mail7.html#09864"><STRONG>Main</STRONG></A></LI> <LI><A HREF="thrd208.html#09864"><STRONG>Thread</STRONG></A></LI> </UL> </LI> </UL> <!--X-BotPNI-End--> <!--X-User-Footer--> <!--X-User-Footer-End--> </BODY> </HTML>