Re: (ASCEND) NAT on ftp sessions

To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) NAT on ftp sessions
From: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 1997 15:08:55 -0700
In-Reply-To: <34234BBC.6A3C@unitech.com.hk>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

At 12:06 PM 9/20/97 +0800, Stanley Chan wrote:
>Hi Ascend Users,
>
>From pipeline 50 Addendum, I don't understand why the following is
>recommended.
>
>"We recommend you restrict IP addresses used on the local LAN so that
>hosts on the network connecting to the pipeline have each octet of 
>their IP addresses greater than 99 (this only applies to FTP sessions).
>For example, 192.168.121.101 is recommended address, but 192.168.121.
>99 is not."
>
>Is this the NAT problem or the pipeline's firmware's prolem ?
>Could someone tell me about this ?
>Any info. will be greatly appreciated ?

That was an old limitation in the NAT implementation. It has long since
been "resolved" and no longer required. Which version are you running
and which version of the addendum were you looking at ?


Kevin


++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

(ASCEND) NAT on ftp sessions

From: Stanley Chan <stanleyc@unitech.com.hk>

Prev by Date: RE: (ASCEND) Pipeline 75 Questions
Next by Date: (ASCEND) BUG NOTICE
Prev by thread: (ASCEND) NAT on ftp sessions
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) NAT on ftp sessions
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread