Re: (ASCEND) Can a p130 handle a full t1?

To: ascend-users@bungi.com
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Can a p130 handle a full t1?
From: Richard Johnsson <johnsson@interval.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 14:37:54 -0700
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95q+pgcc+pgp.970924122857.30574D-100000@brap.connectnet.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.970924145208.30935C-100000@unix.cde.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

At 12:33 PM 9/24/97 -0700, Josh Beck wrote:
>> the issue should be looked at.  FR works great, just don't try to connect
>> multiple PVC's.
>
>	Multiple PVCs on a P130 works just fine... we have a customer with
>two P130's and a Cisco connected in a triangle, two PVCs on each of the
>P130's and a ton of PVCs on the Cisco. A bit of static routing, interface
>based addressing and everything worked perfectly. It's actually kind of
>handy because when a circuit goes down (happens all the time thanks to
>PacBell) we can look at both PVCs and see if it is the DS1 that is down or
>just one of the PVCs. 

I have exactly the same setup. Works fine.
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) Can a p130 handle a full t1?

From: Craig Salmond <salmond@unix.cde.com>

Re: (ASCEND) Can a p130 handle a full t1?

From: Josh Beck <jbeck@connectnet.com>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) P75: Old vs. New?
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Lost wan ports 3 & 4
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Can a p130 handle a full t1?
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Can a p130 handle a full t1?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread