Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) Max 4000 memory
On Sun, 9 Aug 1998, Matt Holdrege wrote:
> >
> >How does the Max 4000 w/48 modems compared to a cisco AS5200? Just
> >dial-in?
>
> In what terms? The Max has far more features, yet the Cisco supports more
> routing protocols.
>
The most routing will just be OSPF for both.
I found the Lanquest report comparing the AS5200 and Max 4000
in 1996. I just wonder if there have been any improvements
since then. Looking from the hardware standpoint, the Max
should have done a better job. I think it is just a matter
of tuning the software.
> >Also, it looks like I can put 6 of the 16-port modem card into it,
> >for a total of 96 modems. Am I dreaming?
>
> Sorry, but there isn't enough electrical power on the 4000 for 6x16 modems.
> If density and performance are really important to you, you should get a
> Max 6000. It has far more CPU, memory and electrical power for the
> high-density slot cards.
>
Yes, if I could have afforded the Max 6000. But at least someone
on the mailing list indicates that he has a 72-modem Max working.
It is still better than my original intention.
Thanks.
Bao
--
Bao C. Ha (bao@hacom.net) http://www.hacom.net
voice: (706) 736-8717 http://www.hacom.net/web.htm (hosting)
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
Follow-Ups:
References: