Re: (ASCEND) Max 4000 memory

To: "Bao C. Ha" <bao@hacom.net>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Max 4000 memory
From: Matt Holdrege <matt@ascend.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 1998 07:16:47 -0700
Cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980809091048.11253A-100000@saigon.hacom.net>
References: <3.0.5.32.19980809024254.00b8f100@darla.ascend.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

At 09:40 AM 8/9/98 -0400, Bao C. Ha wrote:
>The most routing will just be OSPF for both.

With OSPF you have to be very carefull with your design. The Max is not
designed to be a BDR.

>I found the Lanquest report comparing the AS5200 and Max 4000
>in 1996.  I just wonder if there have been any improvements
>since then.  Looking from the hardware standpoint, the Max
>should have done a better job.  I think it is just a matter
>of tuning the software.

Lanquest seems to be owned primarily by Cisco. You get what you pay for.

Matt Holdrege		http://www.ascend.com	matt@ascend.com
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) Max 4000 memory

From: Matt Holdrege <matt@ascend.com>

Re: (ASCEND) Max 4000 memory

From: "Bao C. Ha" <bao@hacom.net>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) release process
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Max 4000 memory
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Max 4000 memory
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Max 4000 memory
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread