Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) Who's got a Max 6000?
At 11:16 AM 8/12/98 -0400, Jim Howard wrote:
>At 21:24 1998/08/11 -0500, Marcel Brown wrote:
>>In our situation, we are about to outgrow a single Max 4048. Should we get
>>another 4048, should we add a 6000 to the 4048, or would we be better off
>>selling the current 4048 and replacing it with a 6000? I guess the main
>>issue would be price/performance, with the next issue being the complexity
>>of stacking multiple 4048's.
>
>I had heard early on in the first days after the 6000 was officially
>announced that it could be "stacked" with 4000s, does this work yet?
Yes, as long as they are running the same software revision.
>If so, does the 6000 become the "master" of the stack and thus take
>some of the processing load off of the 4000s? This alone would be
>enough for me to bring in a 6000 instead of more 4048s.
The "master" is a per-session function and is determined by which MAX the
first
call lands on.
Kevin Smith Ascend Communications...
Customer Satisfaction ...where Network Solutions never end.
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
References: