Re: (ASCEND) v.90 code stable yet?

[Joe Shaw <jshaw@insync.net>]

On Fri, 21 Aug 1998, Neale Banks wrote:

> We took the plunge yesterday morning (5.0 to 6.1.7).  So far, life is good: 
> no users revolting (well, no more than usual ;-), no signs (yet) of memory
> or IP Pool leaks <FX: looks for wood for touching>

I've had a lot of problems with the recent 6.x loads when doing stacking
and OSPF, even in areas.  Anyone having any luck doing anything a little
more complex than just 60 modems in a box?  We've got 2.1.3 on a TNT that
we like, but I have some issues with the TNT at this point.  

And speaking of the TNT, what's the word on the rumored redesign of
the HDLC card?

> Neale.

Regards,
Joe Shaw - jshaw@insync.net
NetAdmin - Insync Internet Services


++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

Follow-Ups:

• RE: (ASCEND) v.90 code stable yet?
• From: "R. P. McCormick" <RPM@GCQ.net>

References:

• Re: (ASCEND) v.90 code stable yet?
• From: Neale Banks <neale@idesign.com.au>

---

• Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Multilink PPP on TNT and Maxen...
• Next by Date: (ASCEND) Loss of Configuration after power down
• Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) v.90 code stable yet?
• Next by thread: RE: (ASCEND) v.90 code stable yet?
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread