Re: (ASCEND) [Fwd: Ticket #793610]

[Jim Howard <jhoward@lyceum.com>]

>From: support@ascend.com
>This is a known issue which was clearly stated in the 7.0.0 release notes
>(page 2).  The problem here is that the Base Ch Count is incoreectly read as

At 20:47 1998/11/30 -0600, Steven T. Pierce wrote:
>Hmmm.... So it wasn't broke in 7.0b6, it broke in 7.0b7 and they didn't
>fix it for the 7.0.0 release... seems as though they should have FIXED
>it before they RELEASED IT....

Agreed, there should _NEVER_ have been a known issue like this
in the software when it was released.
(or the other "Known Issues" listed in release notes)

An issue that comes up after the release is one thing,
but this one was apparantly known before hand and _SHOULD_ have
caused the code to go to another beta release first.

I don't care how FAST the code gets built,
I care how WELL it gets built, and I'd like to think I'm not alone.

-Jim H
----
Jim Howard             Sr Network Engineer        Lyceum Internet
jhoward@lyceum.com     http://www.lyceum.com/     404.248.1733     

My PGP Public Key: http://www.lyceum.com/~jhoward/pgp-key.txt
Fingerprint: 7E8B E2BA 1314 2535 CB08  CFF9 119B 7CD3 2488 954D

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>