Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) V.90 Question
Mitch, I'd say go for it on the analog boxes. We're seeing no problems
with a similar setup running 6.1.3, and V.90 works a heck of a lot
better than K56FLEX.
'Shot
Mitch Harhay wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> We have max boxes and 1 TNT on our network, we are still running 5.0ap42
> on our boxes. Our customers want v.90, we want v.90, but is there a
> stable release out that won't wreck our current setup that has been
> working pretty much error free for the last 3 months?
>
> We are only stacking TWO of our max boxes which do ISDN (which really
> don't need the upgrade). The other boxes are not stacked, no OSPF,
> nothing really special, only analog calls (v.90). The boxes are pretty
> heavily used (minimum of 33+ connections 24hrs a day out of 48. Peak
> times 96% capacity)
>
> I am hesitant to upgrade to v.90 if it is going to degrade the service.
> However, I also don't want to lose customers to my competitors who are
> running v.90 on the "other guys" remote access hardware.
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Mitch Harhay
> Access Nevada, Inc.
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
References: