Re: (ASCEND) POTS bonding (fwd)

To: ascend-users@bungi.com (Ascend Users)
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) POTS bonding (fwd)
From: MegaZone <megazone@megazone.org>
Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 09:21:53 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: WPI Discordian Society, Undocumented Cabal of the Accursed Saint Shiranto Joe
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

Once upon a time Phillip Vandry shaped the electrons to say...
>The last time I read the spec (RFC1717, I think there's a superseding RFC
>now), supporting incongruous links in the same bundle was left as a
>problem for the implementor. Implementors are encouraged to use a bit of

RFC 1990 is the current MP RFC.  Hasn't changed that though.  Most vendors
either don't support it, or strongly discourage it.  Isn't a lot of demand
for mismatched bonding anyway.

-MZ
-- 
<URL:mailto:megazone@megazone.org> Gweep, author, webmaster, human being, me
"A little nonsense now and then, is relished by the wisest men" 781-788-0130
<URL:mailto:megazone@gweep.net> <URL:http://www.megazone.org/> Hail Discordia!
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

Follow-Ups:

Re: (ASCEND) POTS bonding (fwd)

From: "Kevin A. Smith" <kevin@ascend.com>

Prev by Date: (ASCEND) DOV ISDN (fwd)
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Stupid NAT tricks...
Prev by thread: (ASCEND) Max -isdn-> Pipeline -ether-> Pipeline -isdn-> Pipeline
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) POTS bonding (fwd)
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread