Re: (ASCEND) POTS bonding

["Kevin A. Smith" <kevin@ascend.com>]

Almost 100%...just one clarification....the MAX *never* fragments.
The MAX *does* however handle receiving fragments (an RFC requirement).

At 01:26 PM 5/7/98 -0400, Jim Howard wrote:
>
>I've only ever done this from BSD/OS 3.0 and Win95+DUN-1.2,
>but I can say that the Max _appears_ to use a "first idle"
>scenario to select the link on which to send a packet (or fragment)
>
>such that a session with two ISDN B channels + a modem
>would select whichever channel has been free the longest,
>and might transmit packets something like this very simplified layout:
>
>        #1 -> Modem 1
>        #2 -> ISDN 1
>        #3 -> ISDN 2
>        #4 -> ISDN 1 (Modem 1 still in use)
>        #5 -> Modem 1
>        #6 -> ISDN 2
>        #7 -> ISDN 1
>        #8 -> ISDN 2 (Modem 1 still in use)
>        #9 -> Modem 1
>        [repeat until done]
>
>-Jim H


Kevin 
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

References:

• Re: (ASCEND) POTS bonding
• From: Jim Howard <jhoward@lyceum.com>

---

• Prev by Date: (ASCEND) SORRY! Where's the beef?
• Next by Date: RE: (ASCEND) DOV ISDN
• Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) POTS bonding
• Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) POTS bonding
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread