TCLUG Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [TCLUG:15227] <OT> M$ Access rant and bug warning
- To: tclug-list@mn-linux.org
- Subject: Re: [TCLUG:15227] <OT> M$ Access rant and bug warning
- From: Jon Schewe <jpschewe@eggplant.mtu.net>
- Date: 09 Apr 2000 20:29:38 -0500
- In-Reply-To: Troy Johnson's message of "Mon, 27 Mar 2000 15:43:35 -0600"
- References: <2.2.16.20000327152823.5487c4da@smtp.agritech.com> <38DFE2C3.B8BE61B0@iexposure.com> <38DFD607.4B55DC1C@tc.umn.edu>
- Reply-To: jpschewe@eggplant.mtu.net
- Sender: jpschewe@eggplant.mtu.net
- User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) XEmacs/21.1 (Bryce Canyon)
Troy Johnson <john1536@tc.umn.edu> writes:
> Adam Maloney wrote:
> > Yes, I've seen some of this wierdness with Access. Dissappearing
> > records, etc. That's why Microsoft says it shouldn't be used for the
> > backend to web-databases (in RE: to ColdFusion/ASP/WebPlus/whatever).
>
> Yes!
>
> I think I read somewhere that it is recommended that you should only use
> Access for data and databases you don't really care about or want.
>
> Or maybe that's just what I learned. ;-)
Got some more information here. I was losing records too using java through
sql to talk to the database. I upgraded the database to the 4.x format,
between 97 and 2000, 2000 will work too, and it's working fine now.
--
Jon Schewe
http://eggplant.mtu.net/~jpschewe
schewe@tcfreenet.org