Re: [TCLUG:18657] RoadRunner service?

["Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net>]

No static IP address.  Terrible latency for what you are paying (usually).
Lot's of problems with lost packets.  Not alot of downtime in my [past]
experience after two-way rolls out.

Tom Veldhouse
veldy@veldy.net

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jon Schewe" <jpschewe@eggplant.mtu.net>
To: <tclug-list@mn-linux.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 8:08 PM
Subject: [TCLUG:18657] RoadRunner service?


> I'm looking for what people think of RoadRunner's service?  Currently I
have
> Onvoy IDSL and it's pretty good, but every now and then I have some
downtime,
> like last weekend I was down for 3 days and that really ticked me off.  So
I'm
> wondering of RoadRunner's service is as good or better.  Until now my only
> high speed option was IDSL, now Time-Warner is offering cable modem
service
> via RoadRunner.
>
> Only thing RoadRunner doesn't provide is a static IP, at least according
to
> the web site.
>
>
> --
> Jon Schewe
> http://eggplant.mtu.net/~jpschewe
> schewe@tcfreenet.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tclug-list-unsubscribe@mn-linux.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tclug-list-help@mn-linux.org
>
>