[VANILLA-L:1041] Re: [VANILLA-L:1039] Re: [VANILLA-L:1034] Server resources

To: vanilla-l@us.netrek.org
Subject: [VANILLA-L:1041] Re: [VANILLA-L:1039] Re: [VANILLA-L:1034] Server resources
From: Bob Tanner <tanner@real-time.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1998 16:45:11 -0500
In-Reply-To: <199808212115.QAA22098@tiny.net>; from sheldon@visi.com on Fri, Aug 21, 1998 at 04:15:18PM -0500
References: <199808212115.QAA22098@tiny.net>
Reply-To: vanilla-l@us.netrek.org
Sender: owner-vanilla-l

Quoting sheldon@visi.com (sheldon@visi.com):
>  Alpha's do require more RAM, probably because the instruction size is larger.  I'd probably say a minimum of 64 Megs would work if that was the only thing running.
> 
>  Oh, and instead of Linux, why not OpenBSD?

I'm a linux bigot.
-- 
Bob Tanner <tanner@real-time.com>       | Phone : (612)943-8700
http://www.real-time.com                | Fax   : (612)943-8500
Key fingerprint =  6C E9 51 4F D5 3E 4C 66 62 A9 10 E5 35 85 39 D9 

+
++ Vanilla-l Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe vanilla-l" to majordomo@real-time.com
For more information: http://archives.real-time.com

References:

[VANILLA-L:1039] Re: [VANILLA-L:1034] Server resources

From: sheldon@visi.com

Prev by Date: [VANILLA-L:1043] Invincible bug?
Next by Date: [VANILLA-L:1040] Re: [VANILLA-L:1037] Re: [VANILLA-L:1034] Server resources
Prev by thread: [VANILLA-L:1039] Re: [VANILLA-L:1034] Server resources
Next by thread: [VANILLA-L:1040] Re: [VANILLA-L:1037] Re: [VANILLA-L:1034] Server resources
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread