Re: [VANILLA-LIST:2847] The r.g.n ejection debate

To: vanilla-list@us.netrek.org
Subject: Re: [VANILLA-LIST:2847] The r.g.n ejection debate
From: Bob Tanner <tanner@real-time.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 14:22:05 -0600
In-Reply-To: <20000128105437.A16721@isis.visi.com>; from sheldon@visi.com on Fri, Jan 28, 2000 at 10:54:37AM -0600
References: <200001280219.UAA18209@paladin.real-time.com> <20000128105437.A16721@isis.visi.com>

Quoting sheldon (sheldon@visi.com):
>  And no timercide!!!!

I think continuum has a good compromise, part of the day, no geno timer and
the other part a standard geno timer.

-- 
Bob Tanner <tanner@real-time.com>       | Phone : (612)943-8700
http://www.real-time.com                | Fax   : (612)943-8500
Key fingerprint =  6C E9 51 4F D5 3E 4C 66 62 A9 10 E5 35 85 39 D9

References:
- The r.g.n ejection debate
  - From: David Swasey <swasey@cs.cmu.edu>
- Re: [VANILLA-LIST:2847] The r.g.n ejection debate
  - From: sheldon <sheldon@visi.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [VANILLA-LIST:2847] The r.g.n ejection debate
Next by Date: Re: [VANILLA-LIST:2847] The r.g.n ejection debate
Prev by thread: Re: [VANILLA-LIST:2847] The r.g.n ejection debate
Next by thread: clue check & eject
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread